This one is a ranking claim, and rankings are checkable because the filings are public. Members of Congress have to report any trade over $1,000 under the STOCK Act. Collins's filings are unusually busy. CoinDesk went through them in December 2024 and found his was "the most extensive record, according to his disclosures, with 19 trades going back to November" — the most active direct crypto trader in the House at the time. The Campaign Legal Center's read of the 2023 and 2024 disclosures put him third across the whole Congress. It did not stop. His 2025 filings show around a dozen more crypto trades, several of them Ethereum purchases in the tens of thousands, and a position of up to $150,000 in a memecoin called Ski Mask Dog that then collapsed. Net crypto spending across the filings runs somewhere between $68,026 and $495,000; current holdings between $118,005 and $345,000. Those are wide bands because the law only asks for bands. So Ossoff said "one of the most active," and the best single source says Collins is simply the most active. A hedge that generous over a record that strong is not a hard bar to clear. Two honest limits. Disclosure only captures trades over $1,000, so every ranking here is a ranking of what was disclosed, not of everything that happened. And "active" is a count, not a sum — CoinDesk notes other members have moved bigger money, pointing at Shri Thanedar selling at least $365,000 in various coins. Ossoff said active, and on the count he is right. Ossoff is running against Collins for this seat. That is worth saying out loud, and it is not a reason to mark the claim down. An opponent raising a public record is what opponents are for. The question is only whether the record says what he said it says, and it does.